July 13, 2020 at 6:00 PM - Regular Board of Directors Meeting
Agenda | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Call to Order
Rationale:
NOTE: The agenda is on file at the LPNNRD office and may be changed up to 24 hours prior to the meeting as scheduled.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1.A. Meeting Notice
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1.B. Inform Public on Location of Copy of “Open Meeting Act”
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1.C. Pledge of Allegiance
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2. Roll Call
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2.A. Introductions
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3. Approval of Agenda
Rationale:
Are there any additions or corrections to agenda?
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4. Comments - Advisors/Guests
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.A. Guest Comments
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.B. NRCS Report
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.C. NARD Report
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.D. NRC Report
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.E. Managers Report
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.F. Education Program
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5. Approval of Minutes
Rationale:
Are there any additions or corrections to the Board Meeting Minutes? If not they will be approved on the consent agenda.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6. Report of Standing Committees
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.A. Executive Committee - Action as Required
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.A.1. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.A.1.a. Off Site Water Table Concerns Near Sand Creek
Rationale:
I will hand out a letter from our LARM attorneys regarding the potential litigation with Stoeber and Harding.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.A.2. MEETINGS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.A.2.a. Pending
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.A.2.b. Reports
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.A.3. MANAGEMENT ITEMS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.A.3.a. Directors Absence
Rationale:
I have placed Director Absence request in each director box.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.A.3.b. Monthly Education Program
Rationale:
With our first meeting back from our Zoom meetings is there any interested in having an educational program?
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.A.4. EQUIPMENT
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.A.5. PERSONNEL
Rationale:
Personnel Sub-Committee meeting
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.A.5.a. Personnel Sub-Committee Meeting
Rationale:
I would like to schedule a personnel sub-committee meeting prior to our next board meeting. The meeting would be limited to reviewing General Manager evaluations and staff evaluations/salary adjustments.
The Personnel Sub-Committee will meet Monday, July 13th at 5:00 p.m. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.A.5.b. Staff Evaluations and Reviews
Rationale:
All annual staff evaluations and reviews have been conducted. As in the past two years, a dollar amount increase, not a percentage increase will be given to staff dependent on the outcome of their evaluation and will be staff-wide, regardless of position. The 2021 annual salary rate increases will be as follows:
Unsatisfactory or Needs Improvement - No salary increase Fully Satisfactory - $ 1,000 Commendable - $ 1,250 Outstanding - $ 1,500 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.A.6. FINANCE
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.A.6.a. Approval of Financial Reports
Rationale:
Attached are the May Financial Statements. Grant gave the monthly update to the Executive Committee.
Recommended Motion(s):
To approve the May Financial Reports as presented Passed with a motion by Board Member #1 and a second by Board Member #2.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.A.6.b. Approval of Managers Time and Expense Sheets
Rationale:
Attached find Gottschalk's time and expense sheets.
Recommended Motion(s):
To approve Managers Time and Expense Sheets as attached Passed with a motion by Board Member #1 and a second by Board Member #2.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.A.6.c. Accounts over 90 Days
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.A.6.d. Budget Workshop
Rationale:
If we plan to have a budget workshop we need to set the date and time. We normally hold it before the August Board Meeting.
Recommended Motion(s):
To hold the Budget Workshop on Wednesday, August 5th at 5:00 p.m. Passed with a motion by Board Member #1 and a second by Board Member #2.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.A.6.e. Budget Hearing and Levy Hearing
Rationale:
We normally hold our budget hearing on hour prior to our August Board Meeting and our levy hearing one hour prior to hour September Board Meeting.
Recommended Motion(s):
To hold our FY21 Budget Hearing August 10th at 5:00 p.m. and our Levy Hearing September 14th at 5:00 p.m. Passed with a motion by Board Member #1 and a second by Board Member #2.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.A.6.f. Preliminary '21 LPNNRD Draft Budget
Rationale:
At the July board meeting I will be sharing the initial '21 draft budget. This year we will be using a new budget format which will allow us to budget and track our fiscal year expenses in the same format as we see each month in our financial statements.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.B. Education, Operations & Rural Water Systems Committee - Action as Required
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.B.1. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Rationale:
There is nothing to consider for unfinished business.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.B.2. WILD NE AND OTHER PROGRAMS
Rationale:
Nothing to report.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.B.3. OPERATION & MAINTENANCE & OTHER ITEMS
Rationale:
The O & M Crew has and continues to inspect and do maintenance on watershed dams, we have completed 37 of the 45. We have also gone over the Clear Creek Levee. Also, regular maintenance on vehicles and equipment.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.B.3.a. Clear Creek Levee Repair by Corps of Engineers
Rationale:
The fourth train of rock arrived Sunday and will be used in the levee area of Thomas Lakes which is approximately 90-95% complete. They have received a permit from BNSFRR so work can start in the Fuse Plug floodway along the BN tracks. It is anticipated that the above mentioned work will be completed by July 10. They anticipate having all work/repair completed by the third week of July.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.B.3.b. Rawhide Ditch 8 - FEMA
Rationale:
We will submit our final paperwork on this project to NEMA the first week of July and wait for reimbursement.
JEO's contract was for $45,765 and in final we will have paid them $44,503.75, a difference of $1,261.25. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.B.3.c. Wanahoo Stilling Basin - (FEMA)
Rationale:
On Tuesday, June 23, FYRA conducted a Pre-construction meeting for interested contractors. Five contractors attended the meeting and Heimann showed them the site. FYRA hopes the contractors give some feedback on the project so final design can be completed.
FYRA did not receive any feed back from the contractors. Design will be sent to NDNR Dam Safety this week for permit review. We will advertise July 10, 17, 24. Open bids July 28th, take bids to Operations Committee July 30 and the Board August 10. We will issue Notice of Award August 11and Notice to Proceed September 8. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.B.3.d. Wanahoo Auxiliary Spillway RCC Repair Quotes
Rationale:
Heimann requested interest from six Concrete Repair Companies via email addressing the RCC cracks in the Auxiliary Spillway on the Wanahoo Dam. Two companies have interest and looked at the site, one declined and three did not respond.
Aksarben Concrete gave a quote of $38,493 and the Driveway Company $70,000. The Driveway Company didn't seem to enthused. The auxiliary spillway is approximately 670' long and 100 -120' in length vertically. This information can be used for budgetary purposes and in consideration as how we want to approach it. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.B.3.e. Cottonwood 21-A Emergency Spillway
Rationale:
As a reminder, Cottonwood 21-A (High Hazard Dam) is considered to be "in poor condition" because of "Inadequate Spillway Capacity".
Saunders County's engineering firm, Mainelli Wagner has completed a survey and potential design in which they will review with Saunders County Highway Dept. It will also be sent to NDNR Dam Safety for their review. If it's approved by NDNR we will need to discuss how to approach this improvement. We can ask Saunders County if they can assist with construction and develop an agreement or we may have to hire a private contractor to do the work. We do not have a cost estimate at this time. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.B.3.f. Czechland Lake Camping Revenue
Rationale:
As of June 26, the monetary amount received from camping at Czechland Lake is $8,284.00
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.B.3.g. Operations Budget
Rationale:
See attached a preliminary budget spreadsheet for Operations & Maintenance.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.B.4. ROCK AND JETTY
Rationale:
Heimann inspected the Drahota project in Colfax County and payment was made.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.B.5. LAKE WANAHOO
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.B.5.a. Lake Wanahoo Permit Sales
Rationale:
Lake Wanahoo Annual Permit sales for the month of June totaled $12,945.00. June totals from 2019 totaled $12,290.00. The District is continuing to see an increase in annual permit sales. At the end of June 2019 the District had received $67,384.50 in annual permit sales income, compared to $80,027.50 for the same time period in 2020.
The 2020 Annual Park Permit Sales spreadsheet breakdown is attached.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.B.5.b. Lake Wanahoo Cabin Update
Rationale:
The new primitive cabins are nearly complete. In June, Hancock Construction completed their portion of the interior framing, Butler Public Power trenched in the service line, and Harris Electric started the finish work on the electricity. The District will open the cabins for reservations on July 8th. Over the Fourth of July three cabins have been rented through our office. Public interest has been very high and staff is excited to finish this unique addition to the campground at Lake Wanahoo.
The reservation rate for these cabins will be $40/night and all will be available on Reserve America. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.B.6. INFORMATION AND EDUCATION
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.B.6.a. Information
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.B.6.a.1. Radio & eAds
Rationale:
We are featuring our three recreation areas for our KTIC Radio ad and Wahoo Newspaper eAds which are attached.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.B.6.a.2. Analytics
Rationale:
Direct traffic to our site has picked up. This could be from past users directly typing lpnnrd.org vs searching for our site through a search engine. We received 31 clicks from our Facebook page to our website. Overall we’re showing a decline in users to the website, but Lake Wanahoo, Czechland and the Outdoor Recreation page views remain steady.
Our Facebook page has slowly declined in views since May, but our followers keep increasing. The page has 1,152 followers as of July 1. Our top posts included: a summer water conservation graphic from EPA, June board meeting date and time, and well decommissioning program info.
Our Twitter page continues to slowly grow with more followers each month. Our top posts included: Pollinator seed available at the office (sadly we didn’t see many people stop by to grab some - still available if anyone would like to take some home!), well decommissioning program, Nebraska pollinator week downloadable activities.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.B.6.a.3. Lake Wanahoo Advertisement with News Channel Nebraska
Rationale:
During the months of April, May and June, we purchased the "News Sponsorship" package with News Channel Nebraska for our Lake Wanahoo commercial. The commercial spot was a 30-second spot, with a 5-second spot showing the LPNNRD logo. The commercial and LPNNRD logo was shown a total of 47 times during the last half of April. And 114 times during the month of May. The time of day for the ads to be shown ranged from early AM to late PM. We have not received our update from June’s schedule yet. June is the last month we will be advertising the Lake Wanahoo commercial. News Channel Nebraska has been great to work with and we hope to continue advertising with them in the future.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.B.6.b. Education
Rationale:
Nebraska Pollinator Week was held June 21-27. Throughout the week we shared posts about pollinators, created 3 activity sheets and offered free pollinator seed mix. https://lpnnrd.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/LPNNRD_Pollinator_Activity_set.pdf
I have also attached the Fiscal Year 2020 Educational Opportunities report. We were going very steady with numbers throughout the school year until March when the effects of COVID-19 began to cancel many events. Here are the list of events that had been cancelled. Wahoo Cub Scouts event - approx 10-15 kids Spring Conservation Sensation - approx 300 Wahoo Headstart year-end celebration - approx 30 Wahoo 9th grade PE class - approx 75 Schuyler 3rd grade year-end fun day - approx 30 4H/NRD Outdoor Day - approx 40 Youth Ag Tour - approx 20 Kids Summer Institute - approx 20 Sadly, if we would have been able to hold those events we would have been around 2500 youth impacted which was nearly the same exact number as we were at for Fiscal Year 2019. With the uncertainties of how schools plan to operate in the next few months we plan to continue promoting our educational resources as we have in the past and will wait to hear more from educators soon.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.B.7. RURAL WATER SYSTEMS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.B.7.a. Colon System
Rationale:
Colon RWD was due for our three year Lead and Copper testing this month. One of the five test sites opted out of participating, so a new cooperating site that met DHHS testing qualifications was located and testing completed the week of June 15.
Routine monthly sampling completed, meters read and bills mailed June 30. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.B.7.b. Bruno System
Rationale:
On June 19 the RWD was alerted by the Buter County Landfill about a leak on their property. The leak was out of the RWD's utility easement and was caused by Waste Connections staff excavating near their truck fill station. Supply was shut at the meter and repair was handled by Waste Connection.
Monthly sampling completed and bills mailed June 30. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.B.7.c. Other
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.C. Water Committee - Action as Required
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.C.1. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.C.2. REGULATORY
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.C.2.a. GROUND WATER MANAGEMENT AREA
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.C.2.a.1. Variance Expanded Water Use with Allocation
Rationale:
The Committee heard from the staff on the changes shown on attached document. The changes are making the variance a 3 year commitment and establishing a deadline of March 15.
Recommended Motion(s):
To approve the changes to the variance by making the variance a 3-year commitment and no approval after March 15. Passed with a motion by Board Member #1 and a second by Board Member #2.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.C.2.a.2. Well Permit Program
Rationale:
Larry Kaspar (Kaspar Tree Farms, west side of Hwy 77)) has applied for an additional well on Section 34-16N-8E, Yutan Subarea, Restricted Development Area. A review of DNR’s Well Registration database indicates that the only high capacity well within 600 feet of the proposed new well is their existing well, G-122873. Kaspar has concerns about the continuing dry weather and needs second well for the trees. He would like to drill the well as soon as possible. Drip Irrigation will be used as the irrigation system for trees with 136 certified irrigated acres.
The Committee would like more information and deferred the decision to the Board Meeting on July 13. After the Committee meeting, staff had Katie Cameron review the location. Her comments are shown below with detailed information attached with AEM information. Katie's comments: After looking at the 2018 AEM Flight Line data and nearby registered well logs, it looks like the SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Sec 34 T16N R8E would be as good as or possibly better than the current irrigation well in the NE1/4 of the NE1/4 based on the resistivity shown on the App. 1 Profiles as far as the sandstone saturated thickness that is potentially available. As usual there is not a line directly over the land we are looking at but based on the nearby information that is my opinion. It also looks like the logs are reporting the first deep thicker sandstone unit deeper than some of the images might make it appear. With this additional information staff doesn't see an issue with this new well permit.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.C.2.a.2.A. Well Permits Approved
Rationale:
Wells Permits Approved: #
The total number of approved permits for 2020 is #
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.C.2.a.3. Nitrogen Management Areas
Rationale:
Staff has been setting up demonstration field sites in the Schuyler-Richland Area. There are two fields with nitrogen test strips with different rates of fertilizer. There will be tissue samples taken with yield results recorded. After harvest some deeper soil samples will be taken on both fields to examine nitrate movement. The one field is a gravity field in which soil moisture sensors were installed with a data logger on both ends of the field to track moisture through a 4 foot profile.
The other field is a pivot with equipment at the present time from Crop Metrics, Metos Company and Phytech. Servi-Tech is assisting in this project along with Aaron Nygren - UNL extension. Staff will be discussing the equipment with each firm on a weekly basis. The 2019 NET grant had $5,000 in its budget to assist in funding these projects along with an additional $9,600 for soil probes. Staff is looking at taking some soil samples to analysis the soil particles and possibility a trench to see the depth of the corn roots. Pictures are attached. Attached is a quad map showing the geological interpretation, which might explain the possibility for different management even within the area. Also attached is an quote for $4,300 from EA Engineering which conducted the initial coring in this area. Staff would like the Committee to accept the contract so the NRD can collect the information from the fertilizer test strips.
Recommended Motion(s):
To recommend signing the contract from EA Engineering for $4,300 to conduct soil coring within the nitrogen test strips. Passed with a motion by Board Member #1 and a second by Board Member #2.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.C.2.a.4. Nitrate Management Grant
Rationale:
Projects for the Grant:
Cover Crops - $160,000 (40 producer, maximin 80 acres, $50/acre) Tissue Sampling - $2,000 (200 samples at $10/sample) Flow Meters - $350,000 (350 meters at $1000/meter) Monitoring wells - $100,000 (2 nested sites with 4 inch casing for sampling) Field Mapping - $10,000 (10 producers at $1000/field) High End Soil Moisture Sensors - $20,000 (20 producers at $1000/field) Committee Suggestions? The total amount of a NET grant would be $642,000, which would be over 2 years and normally be about 25 percent for the LPNNRD. The LPNNRD requirement would be $160,500 over a 2 year period. If the LPNNRD proceeds the Committee will need to set policy for how the cost-share will be distributed. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.C.2.a.5. NRD Framework Project
Rationale:
Here is an updated version on the obligation for LPN. At last month's meeting staff inform the Committee that it would be around $43,000. Shown below is another breakdown which shows LPN portion at $49,000 to do this project. The difference is DNR could not come up with as much money as anticipated. This amount will be done over 2 fiscal years and next year's budget is showing $30,000. The Board agreed at last months meeting to participate in a WSF grant with the other 3 NRDs.
Papio has retained JEO to write the grant with this comment from Paul Woodward: Marlin Petermann is OK with us going ahead and retaining JEO to prepare the WSF grant for the $9,000. If we are successful, he suggests splitting this per the Interlocal Agreement and if we are not Papio will eat the cost.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.C.2.a.6. Cost Share Programs
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.C.2.a.6.A. Irrigation Well Sample Kits
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.C.2.a.6.B. Flow Meter Maintenance Program
Rationale:
Staff is going to start the process of collecting information from interested firms to conduct the meter maintenance for the District. Staff will be looking at a 3 year contract. Might even consider 2 firms if distance becomes a factor.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.C.2.b. CHEMIGATION
Rationale:
For 2020 we have 686 renewals and 32 new permit applications for a current total of 718. Inspections for 189 renewal permits have been completed.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.C.3. GROUNDWATER BUDGET 20-21
Rationale:
Recommended Groundwater Budget for 20-21 is attached.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.C.4. SURFACE WATER PROGRAMS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.C.4.a. STATE LAKES, FOR THE WEEK OF
Rationale:
Week of June 22nd, 2020
This week's beach Bacteria and Harmful Algal Bloom results are now posted on the NDEE web page (https://deq-iis.ne.gov/zs/bw/). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.C.5. GROUND WATER PROGRAMS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.C.5.a. DECOMMISSIONED WELL PROGRAM
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.C.5.a.1. Well Estimates
Rationale:
# new wells has been reviewed and approved for decommissioning since the last Committee meeting.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.C.5.a.2. Plugged Wells
Rationale:
# wells have been plugged, reviewed, and ready for cost share payment approval this month.
Recommended Motion(s):
To approve payments for well decommissioning to Marvin Kasik for $679.94; David Grotelueschen for $1,000; Reznicek Farms GP 2 wells for $1,204.06 and Tommy E. King for $343.35. Passed with a motion by Board Member #1 and a second by Board Member #2.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.C.6. LOWER PLATTE NORTH NRD GROUND WATER STUDIES
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.C.6.a. Lower Platte River Basin Water Management Plan Coalition (LPRBC)
Rationale:
An agreement is attached from the Flatwater group to start the process of updating the information from 2012 to current. This data will be used for INSIGHT (An Integrated Network of Scientific Information & GeoHydrologic Tools) to help in determining water use in the basin. The Committee and Board already approved $10,000 for LPN portion to be put into next year's budget to start this process. NeDNR was at the Committee meeting but no presentation on INSIGHT.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.C.6.b. Lower Platte River Consortium
Rationale:
As the Drought Plan has been completed and approved, the group is onto the next stage which is doing a desktop scenario with participating staff members. A complete breakdown of the cost is shown below, which LPN share would be $2,849. This amount is included in next year's budget. A copy of original agreement (attached) states the cost for each NRD could be up to $40,000. At this time the LPN has spend $26,000 to assist in the contributing match on the initial grant. This agreement ends in September, with the group looking at a extension to complete and evaluate the desktop exercise.
The Committee asked what the desktop exercise will accomplish? This will allow the group to go through a drought scenario for the first time and an opportunity to evaluate each project identified in the plan for this type of situation. Notes from Jennifer Schellpeper on the project: The cost of the drought workshop scope of work is $39,723. Those costs will be partially paid from remaining grant and consortium funds as well as new contributions from each party, according to the table below. This workshop is called for on page 81 of the Lower Platte River Drought Contingency Plan. Two focused tasks will be carried out at the workshop. The first task will focus on communication among the parties and with the public during a drought scenario, the second task will focus on actual responses of each party member to both a flash drought and extended duration drought scenario.
Recommended Motion(s):
To approve $2,849 for a desktop exercise to evaluate the projects identified in the drought plan. Passed with a motion by Board Member #1 and a second by Board Member #2.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.C.6.c. TILE DRAINS
Rationale:
Staff read the comments from Jovan Lausterer and Dave Miesbach - Groundwater Section Supervisor/Water Well Standards. Committee then heard comments from the public in attendance:
Jovan Comments: I believe this does fall under the Natural Resource Districts authority as the term "ground water" is defined under the Nebraska Ground Water Management and Protection Act as "water which occurs in or moves, seeps, filters, or percolates through ground under the surface of the land." See Neb. Rev. Stat. 46-706(2). That being said, NRCS also regulates tiling from the perspective of soil classifications and wetlands. The county also has authority under Neb. Rev. Stat. 31-101 et. seq. to regulate this as that statutory section allows the county board to require any "ditch" to be straightened, widened, altered or deepened if it will be conducive to the public health convenience or welfare. The term ditch is defined under Neb. Rev. Stat. 31-102 to include any "drain or watercourse." The county would also have permitting requirements if the pool is in the floodway/plain. The Department of Natural Resources might also be involved in this project if the project is designed as flood plain management under Neb. Rev. Stat. 31-1001. If the property is in the extraterritorial zoning jurisdiction of a city the property owner could also be required to obtain approval for its effort from the city. All the above said, I would imagine the NRCS will bow out once they determine that the tiled ground doesn’t run contrary to their wetland conservation compliance. Most counties aren’t going to want to regulate a project like that when the pooling is used for irrigation purposes unless the pool of water is sizable enough to create a safety concern. It doesn’t sound like the project is for flood plain management purposes and thus DNR wouldn’t likely care unless we are dealing with a floodway or the project is adjacent to a natural watercourse. Most cities don’t have zoning regulations that tie up these types of projects unless they are in a floodway/plain. It’s a difficult situation for the property owner though as arguably the project should be run by all the above to make sure they don’t believe its contrary to their regulatory scheme. Jovan W. Lausterer Daryl, We have looked at the pictures you sent showing the tile drain set up. Water Well Standards considers this set up similar to tiling around a house. The tile leads to a sump pit and is pumped to the surface. We would not consider this a well. Hope this helps. David L. Miesbach, P.G. GROUNDWATER SECTION SUPERVISOR/ WATER WELL STANDARDS Nebraska Department of Environment and Energy P.O. Box 98922 Lincoln, Nebraska 68509-8922 DIRECT (402) 471-4982 / MAIN OFFICE (402) 471-2186 FAX (402) 471-2909 david.miesbach@nebraska.gov http://dee.ne.gov
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.C.6.d. Voluntary Integrated Water Management Plan - LPNNRD
Rationale:
NeDNR gave a presentation on the annual V-IMP update.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.C.7. OTHER
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.C.7.a. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.D. Projects Committee - Action as Required
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.D.1. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Rationale:
No unfinished business to address.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.D.2. SWCP
Rationale:
Elliott reviewed the attached FY21 SWCP spreadsheet. We have not been OFFICIALLY allocated SWCP dollars from DNR as of July 1. Elliott has been in contact with Jill Richters (who oversees SWCP at DNR) and she has said that it " should be fairly close to last year".
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.D.2.a. SWCP Application Approvals
Rationale:
20-D-1 - Diers Family Farm - Dodge County, Section 32-18N-9E - Livestock well, pumping plant, and stock tank: $18,964.65
The location of this application borders our Rawhide Ditch. In the easement that the NRD and adjoining landowners entered into there is a clause that requires the NRD to supply livestock water is we disallow livestock entering the ditch. Due to the maintenance issues on the banks over the years caused by cattle entering/leaving the ditch our Operations Department decided to fence off the ditch and would like to provide a well for Diers. Through the DNR SWCP program we can submit up to 75% cost-share with the remaining 25% covered by NRD local funds.
Recommended Motion(s):
To approve Diers Family Farm SWCP application for livestock well, pumping plant, and tank for up to 75% state reimbursement and balance covered by NRD funds. Passed with a motion by Board Member #1 and a second by Board Member #2.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.D.2.b. SWCP Payments
Rationale:
20-C-2 - Terry & Spring Wendt - Planned Grazing System - $7,464.60
Recommended Motion(s):
To approve $7,464.60 SWCP payment to Terry & Spring Wendt for completed project - Planned Grazing System Passed with a motion by Board Member #1 and a second by Board Member #2.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.D.2.c. SWCP Cancellations
Rationale:
None
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.D.2.d. Wahoo Creek Cost Share Approvals
Rationale:
None
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.D.3. WATERSHEDS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.D.3.a. Shell Creek
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.D.3.a.1. Shell Creek Environmental Enhancement Plan Implementation
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.D.3.a.1.A. Shell Creek Channel Improvement/Benching Project
Rationale:
Bill Bos has lined up several landowner conservation and septic system upgrade projects in the Shell Creek Watershed and now that we have all grant funding approved, we will now able to begin approving those projects.
At the May 11th LPNNRD Board Meeting, we approved the low bid from Pruss Excavating totaling $167,962.32 for completing the Shell Creek North Channel Improvement/Benching Project and work has started. Colfax County is providing the needed landowner easements, project engineering and construction oversight. This project is located just north of the U.P. Railroad Bridge near County Road 15, east of Schuyler. The County has also started to work on lining things up for moving forward on the Shell Creek South Channel Improvement Project, just south of the U.P. Railroad Bridge. Pruss has agreed to do this south channel work as a contract addendum at the same unit prices for the Shell Creek North Channel Project. Director Bailey reported that the U.P. Railroad is moving forward with replacing their bridge at Colfax County road 14 and the County Road bridge replacement project is also scheduled to be replaced this summer. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.D.3.a.1.B. Tom Sprunk Bank Stabilization/Wetlands Project
Rationale:
Tom Sprunk has been working with Bill Bos and Jim Reedy, NRCS, on finalizing plans for completing his wetlands enhancement and bank stabilization project. LPNNRD will assist with the bidding process as the project is scheduled to be completed this summer. We have previously approved 75% cost share on this project that has a rough estimate of $25,000 at this time. Our plan is to use approved grant funding from NDEE and NET to reimburse LPNNRD for our contribution.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.D.3.a.1.C. Shell Creek Grant Funding Update
Rationale:
We have received the Inter-Governmental Grant Agreement (attached) from the Nebraska Department of Environment and Energy (NDEE) for the Shell Creek Watershed. Jovan has reviewed the agreement and his comments are attached. This EPA 319 grant will provide $365,000 to combine with our approved $104,688 from the Nebraska Environmental Trust (NET) for helping complete Shell Creek projects. These projects include the Shell Creek Channel Improvement Project, Tom Sprunk Wetland Project and numerous landowner conservation and septic system upgrade projects in the watershed. Manager Gottschalk electronically signed the attached NDEE agreement on June 22nd so that projects could immediately begin.
Recommended Motion(s):
To ratify General Manager Eric Gottschalk's signing of the NDEE Inter-Governmental Grant Agreement for the Shell Creek Corridor Enhancement and Conservation Implementation Project, as attached to the Projects Committee Minutes Passed with a motion by Board Member #1 and a second by Board Member #2.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.D.3.b. Wahoo Creek Watershed
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.D.3.b.1. Wahoo Creek Dam Site Planning Update & FYRA Invoices
Rationale:
NRCS and FYRA continue to work with NRCS in Little Rock NRCS on what additional work and expense will be needed for moving forward with completing the economic analysis for the Wahoo Creek Watershed Plan. We anticipate that a contact addendum with FYRA and agreement with NRCS to cover the additional scope of work and expense will be coming soon.
We may have another invoice from FYRA by the July 13th Board meeting for work completed under our present contract. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.D.3.b.2. Wahoo Creek Watershed Water Quality Plan Phase II
Rationale:
We continue to prepare for upcoming Wahoo Creek Watershed Projects with landowners.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.D.3.b.3. Olsson Design Update and Invoice - Mike Placke & Andrew Philips
Rationale:
Attached is a $12,706.55 Olsson invoice for Geo-tech (soil analysis) on Wahoo Creek Sites 26a, 26b and 27 from. Mountford asked about the monthly invoices when the field work for soil sampling actually occurred last fall. Olsson explained that the required work has been done in segments instead of all at once, since the project has not been on a fast track due to the watershed plan completion delays. To date, 79.2% of the Geo-tech budget has been expended for the three dam sites mentioned (see attachment). After this payment, $245,281.11 (42%) will have been expended from this project phase that totals $583,825. As has been mentioned in the past, the majority of the contract phase involving the design of the eight dams has been unspent and will remain so until the Wahoo Creek Watershed Plan is approved. The contract phase for designing the eight remaining dams totals $1,416,153.
Andrew Philips, Olsson, joined the Projects Committee meeting by Zoom and gave a presentation of what has been accomplished thus far at Dam Sites 26a, 26b and 27.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.D.4. JOINT WATER MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD (JWMAB) - 7:45 a.m.
Rationale:
We have been working with Dodge County and the City of Fremont on several joint projects. Tom Smith & Bob Missel (Dodge County) and Brian Newton and Lottie Mitchell (Fremont), joined the meeting (by Zoom) to discuss joint project efforts to include those listed below.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.D.4.a. Platte River Camera/Sensor Project
Rationale:
We have been working with Dodge County, City of Fremont and the Papio-Missouri River NRD to place cameras and additional water level sensors at five locations along the Platte River (HW 15, 64, 77, 79 and near the Burlington Northern Railroad Bridge west of Schuyler) to assist with observing flooding issues developing from seasonal rainstorm and ice jams. Attached is an Interlocal Agreement between LPNNRD, PMRNRD, Dodge County and City of Fremont to share the project costs. Dodge County will also submit a FEMA grant application for up to 75% of the maximum project costs as attached. The maximum equipment purchases and related expenses over a two year is estimated at $27,000. While the project includes up to ten cameras, three water sensors and other equipment, only five cameras and two sensors are planned to be placed in 2020. If it is determined that there will be value to place additional cameras and sensors, that would occur in 2021. The Partners are proposing to share the costs ($6,750 each), however there is an excellent chance will will receive up to $20,250 (75%) from the FEMA grant which would cover the cameras, sensors and other equipment costs. If the grant is approved, a good portion of the local expense will be in the form of in-kind staff time provided toward the project.
Recommended Motion(s):
To approve and authorize the Board Chair to sign the Interlocal Cooperation Act Agreement for Platte River Cameras and Sensors as attached to Projects Committee Minutes Passed with a motion by Board Member #1 and a second by Board Member #2.
Recommended Motion(s) #2:
To approve the partnership letter of support, as attached, for the Platte River Cameras/Sensors Project Passed with a motion by Board Member #1 and a second by Board Member #2.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.D.4.b. North Bend Drainage District Project - FEMA/NEMA Grant Fiscal Agent Discussion
Rationale:
Dodge County, LPNNRD and Fremont have been assisting the North Bend Drainage District (NBDD), with submitting a Hazard Mitigation grant application for 75% assistance on what is estimated at $1.7 million project, to repair and improve four miles of the drainage system. Dodge County Emergency Manager Tom Smith has been working on the cost benefits for the project application. Attached is a project map and project description from Larry Ruzicka, NBDD. Discussion at the Projects committee centered on who should be the fiscal agent for the project as NBDD would not be able to handle it. The committee felt that LPNNRD should be consistent with our past precedence to have the county or city be the fiscal agent for large projects. One major reason LPNNRD has followed this precedence is being the fiscal agent on large projects could cause budget challenges while awaiting project reimbursements from grant and local partners. The committee offered to assist Dodge County with project management if they are the fiscal agent.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.D.4.c. Dodge County Platte River Breach Repair (Fremont Rod & Gun Club) Project
Rationale:
The Nebraska Department of Economic Development has awarded the Dodge County Platte River Breach Repair (Fremont Rod & Gun Club) Project up to a $485,000 CDBG grant (letter attached). LPNNRD has approved up to $50,000 toward the Repari Project, located on Fremont Rod and Gun Club property. Mountford has drafted an interlocal agreement (attached) between Fremont, Dodge County and LPNNRD, outlining our financial contributions and future operation and maintenance of the completed project. A very important issue was who will secure and hold public easements for the project area and Fremont has recently agreed to be that party. Jovan has reviewed and commented on the Interlocal Agreement.
Recommended Motion(s):
To approve and authorize the Board Chairman to sign the Dodge County Platte River Breach Repair (Fremont Rod & Gun Club) Project Interlocal Agreement as attached to the Projects Committee Minutes Passed with a motion by Board Member #1 and a second by Board Member #2.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.D.4.d. Fremont East Drainage Ditch Improvement Project Grant Application
Rationale:
Tom Smith, Dodge County Emergency Manager will comment on a Hazard Mitigation Grant application he submitted to study potential improvement on the ditch system east of Fremont. Besides Dodge county and Fremont, LPNNRD is a logical partner to assist financially on a potential project.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.D.5. HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE, PROJECT CONSIDERATION - JEO
Rationale:
As previously reported, JEO has submitted our final Hazard Mitigation Plan to EPA for review and comments. Our Board approved the plan as written on May 11, 2020, which was submitted to FEMA for review.
As discussed at previous committee meetings, there remains $22,000 that is unapproved in the contract that could be used for other project work if we desire. Of the $22,0000, up to $16,500 (75%) would be reimbursed from FEMA. Lalit Jha and Becky Appleford, JEO, joined the meeting (by Zoom) to discuss possibilities (presentation attached). One previous thought was completing some additional breach inundation maps on a few more of our low hazard dams, but after closer review, staff feels that we already have mapped the priority structures and do not feel the need to do more at this time. However, there has been discussion on working with Saunders County on possibly establishing a Dam Breach Overlay District on our already mapped dams, to provide structured zoning requirements for inhabitable dwellings proposed in downstream breach areas. Another item discussed was sponsoring Levee Failure Tabletop Workshop to prepare us and our partners for future levee disasters. The committee was interested in having JEO present a scope of work on expanding our Dam Breach Overlay District (for 15 existing dams) in Saunders County and holding a future Levee Failure Tabletop Workshop. JEO will have a contract outlining a scope of work for Board approval consideration at the July 13th Board meeting. JEO representatives will be also be available at the Board Meeting to answer questions. Attached is JEO's May 29th invoice totaling $1,386.48 for work completed under our HMP contract (progress report also attached). After this payment, $5,313.88 will remain under the $228,000 portion of the contact that LPNNRD has authorized thus far.
Recommended Motion(s):
To have JEO present a scope of work for expanding our Dam Breach Overlay District in Saunders County for 15 existing dams and for conducting a future Levee Failure Tabletop Exercise Passed with a motion by Board Member #1 and a second by Board Member #2.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.D.6. MIKE CHVATAL DAM
Rationale:
Mike Chvatal received another bid for his approved dam project per our suggestion (both bids attached). His current approved cost-share amount is $32,297.00. The dam's location is above one of the high hazard structures (21-A) within the Cottonwood Creek watershed which qualifies it as a "high priority" within our local SWCP Policy. This project also qualifies for grant reimbursement through our NDEE and NET Water Quality grant partnership. Mr. Chvatal is requesting consideration for obtaining up to 75% cost share based on the lower bid of $61,808 as attached. This would raise our maximun cost from $32,297 up to $46,356 ($14,059 increase).
For review: the dam was approved in 2015 and due to a combination of weather, contractor availability, and crop loss worries the project has not been completed and was given a Board mandated completion for 2020. During a pre-stake out design review it was noted that the planned dam outlet elevation was located too high and the potential for erosion to occur from the outlet to the dam embankment was realized. A redesign was completed adding: 1200 cubic yards of additional excavation for an outlet channel 33 extra feet of 12" corrugated metal pipe to reach new, stable outlet location
Recommended Motion(s):
To increase the maximum 75% cost share assistance on the Mike Chvatal Dam from $32,297 to $46,356 Passed with a motion by Board Member #1 and a second by Board Member #2.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.D.7. NEBRASKA BUFFER STRIP PROGRAM
Rationale:
We received four applications for the Nebraska Buffer Strip Program:
Mary Theresa Norton (3 applications): Sections 19 & 20-18N-2E Colfax Co 8 acres - $219.68/acre = $1,757.44 annual payment 13.7 acres - $219.68/acre = $3,009.62 annual payment 11.2 acres - $214.20/acre = $2,399.04 annual payment Sheryl Hansen: Section 32-15N-2E Butler County 9.1 acres - $237.80/acre = $2,163.98 annual payment
Recommended Motion(s):
To approve the four NBSP applications submitted by Mary Theresa Norton and Sheryl Hansen totaling $9,330.08 in annual payments, as shown in the Projects Committee Minutes Passed with a motion by Board Member #1 and a second by Board Member #2.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.D.8. EROSION AND SEDIMENT RULES AND REGULATIONS
Rationale:
No new updates.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.D.9. OTHER
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.D.9.a. Johnson Lake Aeration Project
Rationale:
Fremont representative Don Cunningham joined the Projects Committee to bring more details regarding the proposed aeration system for the City's Johnson Lake. The systems primary purpose is to improve the lakes water quality. The total project including electrical hookup costs is estimated at around $10,000. Mr. Cunningham has been working with the community for donations toward the project as well.
Recommended Motion(s):
To approve 50%, up to $5,000 maximum assistance, toward the City of Fremont's aeration system for Johnson Lake Passed with a motion by Board Member #1 and a second by Board Member #2.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7. Additional Action Items
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7.A. Data Loggers on Monitoring Wells
Rationale:
Staff received a quote for data loggers to be installed in existing or new locations. Some of the data loggers that are being replaced are over 10 years old, with the new sites by poultry farms the need for extra data on the fringe areas. Staff would like to get these installed as soon as possible.
Recommended Motion(s):
To authorize staff to order the data loggers from In-Situ as outline in the quote attached at an estimated cost of $18,565.27. Passed with a motion by Board Member #1 and a second by Board Member #2.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8. Approval of Bills Pending
Recommended Motion(s):
Motion to approve bills pending as presented Passed with a motion by Board Member #1 and a second by Board Member #2.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9. Consent Agenda Adoption
Recommended Motion(s):
Motion to approve Consent Agenda as presented Passed with a motion by Board Member #1 and a second by Board Member #2.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10. Comments from Directors/Guests
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11. Meeting Establishment/Adjournment
Rationale:
NOTE: The agenda is on file at the LPNNRD office and may be changed up to 24 hours prior to the meeting as scheduled. |